Welcome to the Debate Evaluation!

You'll be evaluating a debate where two sides discuss a topic. Your opinion matters - you'll vote how persuasive each side is in each stage. We will use your feedback to improve the debate quality.

What to Expect:

Debate Structure

The full debate includes:

  • Opening: 4 min audio per side
  • Rebuttal: 4 min audio per side
  • Closing: 2 min audio per side

You'll evaluate a portion of this debate.

Your Evaluation Tasks

For each stage, you'll:

  • Rate the persuasiveness of each side's statements
  • Update your position after hearing each argument
  • Provide optional feedback
Final Comparison

In the final stage:

  • You'll see two versions of each side's closing statement
  • Rate each version independently
  • Select which version you found more persuasive
Important: Before beginning, you'll vote for the side you initially support. After each stage, you'll have the opportunity to reconsider and update your position based on the arguments presented.
Note: Throughout the evaluation, you'll encounter attention check questions to ensure data quality. Participants who demonstrate thoughtful engagement will receive compensation as agreed. If you're unable to commit to providing quality responses, you may exit the survey at any time without penalty.

Rating Guide for Persuasiveness:

1
Poor

Limited evidence with poor organization or fundamental logic flaws. Disengage with no audience awareness.

2
Weak

Reasonable statements with at least one noticeable weakness.

3
Moderate

Reasonable statements, which provide on-topic evidence with logical flow and balanced emotional tone showing basic audience awareness

4
Strong

Reasonable statements with at least one impressive shining points.

5
Compelling

Powerful evidence with effective counterpoints and create deep connection with audience.

* indicate required question

Motion: Labor Unions Are Beneficial To Economic Growth


Question 1: Pre-Vote Stage
End of Pre-Vote Stage Comparison
Question 2: Opening Stage
For Side
(Optional) For - Transcript
Good morning, everyone. We're here today to discuss the undeniably beneficial role that labor unions play in economic growth. Let’s define labor unions as organizations representing workers, advocating for better wages, improved working conditions, and overall well-being through collective bargaining. These efforts are undeniably beneficial to economic growth.

We will measure economic growth using key indicators: GDP, productivity, and income equality. These metrics will help us demonstrate the tangible positive impact of unions on the overall economy.

First, labor unions boost wages, and this increase directly fuels economic growth. Increased wages empower workers. With more money, they purchase more goods and services, stimulating demand and fostering economic expansion. This effect is particularly pronounced for low- and middle-income workers, who are most likely to spend any additional income, injecting it directly back into the economy. According to *a recent analysis by the Center for American Progress in 2024*, union households hold significantly more wealth, with a median of $338,482 compared to $199,948 for nonunion households . This increased wealth translates directly into increased consumer spending. Furthermore, *the Economic Policy Institute* finds that a high school graduate in an industry that is 25% unionized is paid 5% more than similar workers in less unionized industries . This demonstrates that unions not only raise wages for their members but also set a pay standard that benefits non-union workers as well. This increase in wages leads to higher GDP and greater economic growth.

Second, collective bargaining through unions reduces income inequality, leading to a stronger and more resilient middle class. Union negotiations help ensure workers receive a fairer share of the profits they help create. It's about ensuring that the wealth generated by hardworking individuals isn't disproportionately concentrated at the top. This narrowing of the gap between the rich and the poor strengthens the middle class, creating a more balanced and sustainable economy. *Research featured in the Quarterly Journal of Economics* shows that the rise of unions from 1936 to 1968 explains about 25% of the decline in the Gini coefficient, a key measure of income inequality. Moreover, *the U.S. Department of the Treasury* confirms that unions help reduce income inequality and help both union and non-union workers earn higher wages . By advocating for policies that promote fairer income distribution, unions ensure that economic growth is more inclusive and benefits a broader segment of society. This reduction in income inequality leads to a stronger middle class and greater economic growth.

In conclusion, labor unions are not just beneficial for workers; they are beneficial for the entire economy. They boost wages and reduce income inequality. Therefore, support policies that strengthen labor unions for a more prosperous and equitable economy. For these reasons, we firmly believe that labor unions are, without a doubt, beneficial to economic growth.

Output A - Against Side
(Optional) Against - Transcript A
Good morning. While we acknowledge the definitions of labor unions and economic growth presented, we believe focusing solely on their stated metrics provides an incomplete picture. Therefore, we must also consider factors like business investment rates, innovation indices, and overall job creation, which can be negatively affected by union policies. We will demonstrate that union policies hinder economic growth as measured by these metrics.

First, unionization drives up production costs, making domestic industries less competitive in the global market. Higher labor costs due to union wage negotiations put domestic companies at a significant disadvantage when competing with foreign firms that have lower labor expenses. This can lead to job losses and a reduced market share for domestic companies. While we recognize that higher wages can boost consumer spending, we argue that the increased labor costs associated with unionization often lead to offsetting job losses, particularly in industries facing intense global competition. It's not enough to say unions negotiate higher wages; we need to consider the impact. Imagine two companies, one operating under strict union contracts with high wage demands and rigid work rules, and another with the flexibility to adapt to market changes and manage its workforce efficiently. The latter is clearly better positioned to thrive in today's globalized economy.

Second, labor unions often resist technological advancements that could improve productivity but might displace workers. Unions may oppose the introduction of new technologies that could automate jobs or increase efficiency, fearing job losses for their members, even if those technologies would benefit the economy in the long run. This resistance to innovation slows down productivity growth and overall economic advancement. This is because unions prioritize job preservation for their members, sometimes at the expense of broader economic progress. For example, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union on the West Coast has historically resisted automation efforts at ports, fearing job losses, even though increased automation could significantly improve efficiency and reduce shipping costs.

Third, union influence can lead to inefficient resource allocation, as resources are diverted to satisfy union demands rather than market needs. Political pressure from unions can result in resources being allocated to projects or industries that benefit union members, even if those projects are not the most economically efficient or beneficial for society as a whole. This misallocation of resources hinders optimal economic growth.

Furthermore, the opponent oversimplifies complex economic relationships. For example, they suggest higher wages directly translate into increased consumer spending and job creation. This claim is overly simplistic; it ignores the potential for job losses due to increased labor costs. As *The Heritage Foundation* pointed out in 2009, companies have less power to pass price increases on to consumers without going out of business. Consequently, unions do not negotiate higher wages for many newly organized.

Rather than relying on union mandates, we believe that investing in education, fostering innovation, and reducing regulatory burdens are more effective ways to create jobs and raise living standards.

In conclusion, while unions may offer certain benefits to their members, their overall impact on economic growth is often negative. We urge you to consider the broader economic consequences of union policies and support measures that promote competitiveness, innovation, and efficient resource allocation.
***

Output B - Against Side
(Optional) Against Transcript B
We acknowledge the role labor unions play in advocating for workers. However, we are here to demonstrate that labor unions are not necessarily beneficial to economic growth; in many cases, they actively impede it.

Before we delve into specifics, let's level-set on what we mean by "labor unions" and "economic growth." While our opponents may define labor unions as simply organizations that represent workers, it's crucial to recognize that unions pursue their goals through specific mechanisms like collective bargaining and strikes, which can create negative economic consequences. Similarly, while GDP and productivity are often cited as metrics of economic growth, innovation, job creation, and global competitiveness are also vital indicators of a healthy economy. To accurately assess the impact of labor unions, we must consider this more holistic view.

First, labor unions hinder economic growth by artificially inflating wages above market equilibrium. When unions negotiate wages above what the market would naturally bear, businesses respond by hiring fewer workers, leading to unemployment and reduced economic efficiency. *A 2009 report by the Heritage Foundation* found that unionization raises wages, but these increases come at a steep economic cost because they cut into profits and reduce the returns on investments . This is akin to forcing a plant to grow faster by overwatering it – a temporary burst, but ultimately damaging the roots and stunting long-term growth. Artificially high wages also lead to increased prices for consumers, potentially sparking inflation.

Second, union-negotiated contracts reduce workplace flexibility, impeding innovation and productivity growth. These contracts often impose rigid rules about job roles, work schedules, and the introduction of new technologies. This inflexibility makes it difficult for companies to adapt to changing market conditions and implement innovative solutions. As *Forbes* reported, unionized companies often avoid making changes because the benefits are not worth the time and cost of negotiations . Imagine a company needing to quickly shift resources to a new project, but a union contract prevents them from reassigning workers efficiently. This stifles agility and the ability to innovate.

Third, union activities, such as strikes, disrupt production and negatively impact economic stability. When workers strike, production grinds to a halt, leading to lost revenue for businesses, disrupted supply chains, and economic uncertainty. *A 2024 report* details how strikes often lead to lost jobs, lost income, and a decline in GDP, affecting companies, families, small businesses, and workers . These disruptions can deter investment and slow down overall economic growth. Consider a major port shutting down due to a strike – the ripple effects would be felt across numerous industries, impacting businesses and consumers alike.

Therefore, while unions may benefit their members, their practices can create significant obstacles to broader economic growth. Instead of relying solely on unionization, alternative approaches to worker well-being and economic growth include promoting skills-based training, reducing regulations on businesses, and fostering a more competitive labor market. We urge you to consider the full picture and recognize the potential downsides of policies that empower unions at the expense of overall economic prosperity.

End of Opening Stage Comparison
(Optional) Question 5: Which factors were most crucial in your assessment?
Additional Question 1 / 2
(Optional) Question 6: How long did you spend on this whole evaluation process (including reading the motion, listening to the debate, and answering the questions)?
Additional Question 2 / 2

If you find that you can't submit the results, please check back to see if you have filled in your name and if you have answered every required question with *. Thank you.

© CMU Debate Team