Welcome to the Debate Evaluation!

You'll be evaluating a debate where two sides discuss a topic. Your opinion matters - you'll vote how persuasive each side is in each stage. We will use your feedback to improve the debate quality.

What to Expect:

Debate Structure

The full debate includes:

  • Opening: 4 min audio per side
  • Rebuttal: 4 min audio per side
  • Closing: 2 min audio per side

You'll evaluate a portion of this debate.

Your Evaluation Tasks

For each stage, you'll:

  • Rate the persuasiveness of each side's statements
  • Update your position after hearing each argument
  • Provide optional feedback
Final Comparison

In the final stage:

  • You'll see two versions of each side's closing statement
  • Rate each version independently
  • Select which version you found more persuasive
Important: Before beginning, you'll vote for the side you initially support. After each stage, you'll have the opportunity to reconsider and update your position based on the arguments presented.
Note: Throughout the evaluation, you'll encounter attention check questions to ensure data quality. Participants who demonstrate thoughtful engagement will receive compensation as agreed. If you're unable to commit to providing quality responses, you may exit the survey at any time without penalty.

Rating Guide for Persuasiveness:

1
Poor

Limited evidence with poor organization or fundamental logic flaws. Disengage with no audience awareness.

2
Weak

Reasonable statements with at least one noticeable weakness.

3
Moderate

Reasonable statements, which provide on-topic evidence with logical flow and balanced emotional tone showing basic audience awareness

4
Strong

Reasonable statements with at least one impressive shining points.

5
Compelling

Powerful evidence with effective counterpoints and create deep connection with audience.

* indicate required question

Motion: Labor Unions Are Beneficial To Economic Growth


Question 1: Pre-Vote Stage
End of Pre-Vote Stage Comparison
Question 2: Opening Stage
For Side
(Optional) For - Transcript
Good morning, everyone. We're here today to discuss why labor unions are beneficial to economic growth. We face significant economic challenges: stagnant wages, rising income inequality, and skilled labor shortages that impede critical infrastructure projects. Labor unions offer a powerful solution. To ensure clarity, let's define our terms. Labor unions are organizations representing workers, advocating for improved wages, working conditions, and overall well-being through collective bargaining. Economic growth will be measured by indicators like GDP, productivity, and income equality across all demographics within the current global landscape. Today, we will demonstrate how labor unions positively impact each of these critical indicators, leading to overall economic growth.

Our criterion for this debate is identifying which side demonstrates the greatest potential for positive impact on overall economic growth. Policies that tangibly improve economic indicators should be considered beneficial.

First, labor unions boost wages, leading to higher consumer spending and economic growth. Increased wages empower workers to purchase more, stimulating demand and fostering economic expansion. *The Center for American Progress*, in their analysis of the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, found that union households possess significantly more wealth, approximately $338,482, compared to nonunion households with about $199,948. This directly translates into increased spending, particularly for low- and middle-income workers. When workers have more money, they spend it locally, supporting businesses and creating jobs, fueling economic growth. This increase in spending directly contributes to GDP growth as businesses expand to meet demand, a model that can be replicated and scaled across the country.

Second, collective bargaining through unions reduces income inequality, leading to a stronger middle class. Union negotiations ensure workers receive a fairer share of profits. This narrows the wealth gap, strengthening the middle class and creating a more balanced economy. *Research published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics* indicates that the rise of unions from 1936 to 1968 explains about 25% of the decline in the Gini coefficient, a key measure of income inequality. By reducing income inequality, unions foster a more stable and equitable economic environment, boosting long-term productivity and overall economic health, a model that can be replicated and scaled across the country.

Finally, union apprenticeships create skilled tradespeople, filling essential roles and supporting infrastructure development. Union-sponsored programs provide comprehensive training in carpentry, plumbing, and electrical work, meeting the demand for skilled workers. *A 2023 study by the Midwest Economic Policy Institute * found that union apprenticeship programs in Indiana’s construction industry deliver more training hours and better diversity outcomes. By providing standardized, high-quality training, union apprenticeships contribute to a more productive and efficient workforce, directly supporting GDP growth through infrastructure development and innovation, a model that can be replicated and scaled across the country.

Against Side
(Optional) Against - Transcript
Good morning. We appreciate the opportunity to discuss whether labor unions are beneficial to economic growth. While we acknowledge the definitions and criteria offered, we believe the central question is whether unions, on balance, promote or hinder overall economic prosperity. We contend that, despite some potential benefits for workers, the negative impacts of labor unions on economic efficiency and growth outweigh the positives.

First, labor unions hinder economic growth by artificially inflating wages above market equilibrium. Unions interfere with the natural forces of supply and demand in the labor market. By artificially increasing wages above what the market would typically bear, unions create inefficiencies. This leads to reduced hiring as companies seek to control costs, potentially increasing unemployment and slowing overall economic growth. *The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, reported in 2009* that unionizing raises wages between 0 and 10 percent, but these wage increases come at a steep economic cost . These costs cut into profits and reduce the returns on investments. Businesses respond predictably by investing significantly less in capital and R&D projects. Artificially inflated wages can also lead to higher prices for consumers, reducing their purchasing power and further dampening economic activity.

Second, union-negotiated contracts reduce workplace flexibility, impeding innovation and productivity growth. Union contracts often impose rigid rules and regulations regarding job duties, work schedules, and staffing levels. This inflexibility can stifle innovation by making it difficult for companies to adapt to changing market conditions or implement new technologies. Reduced flexibility also hinders productivity growth, as companies may be unable to optimize their workforce or respond quickly to unexpected challenges. While unions can sometimes lead to higher wages for their members, *research by Ichniowski and Shaw in 1995* found that organized steel finishing lines are less likely to adopt the most advanced combination of work practices . *The Heritage Foundation also noted in 2009* that unionized employers must pay thousands of dollars in attorney's fees and spend months negotiating before making any changes in the workplace .

Finally, union activities, such as strikes, disrupt production and negatively impact economic stability. Strikes and other forms of labor action can cause significant disruptions to production, supply chains, and overall economic activity. *Data reported in 2024* shows how strikes impact workers and communities, and the economic impact of strikes manifests itself in various forms, ranging from decreasing productivity due to the temporary halt in operations to severe strains on supply chains .

Regarding the claims made by the opposition: we acknowledge unions may boost wages for some, but this does not necessarily translate into overall economic growth. In fact, *a study by the American Action Forum in 2016* found statistically significant evidence that an increase in union membership is associated with a decline in state real GDP growth rate . Similarly, while unions may reduce income inequality in certain sectors, their impact on the broader economy is questionable. We believe that fostering long-term economic growth and opportunity for all is best achieved through policies that promote innovation, investment, and a flexible labor market, rather than through unionization.

End of Opening Stage Comparison
Question 3: Rebuttal Stage
Output A - For Side
(Optional) For - Transcript A
Good morning, everyone. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify our position and directly address the arguments presented.

First, let's refocus on the core of this debate: whether labor unions are beneficial to economic growth. We define economic growth by key indicators such as GDP, productivity, and, crucially, income equality across all demographics. Our stance is that unions, through their role in advocating for workers, create conditions that foster positive change in these areas. The central question is not whether unions are perfect, but whether they offer the greatest potential for a positive impact on economic growth. It's also important to remember that we are talking about the potential for positive change. We are not claiming that unions are the only factor that affects economic growth, but that they are a significant and beneficial one. As *the Economic Policy Institute reported in 2021*, as union membership declined, income inequality increased. This highlights the important role unions play in ensuring that the benefits of economic growth are shared more equitably.

Now, let's address the claim that unions artificially inflate wages, thereby hindering economic growth. The argument suggests that higher wages lead to reduced hiring and increased unemployment. However, this is a simplistic view. While unions do negotiate for better pay, this often motivates businesses to invest in efficiency and innovation. According to *the U.S. Department of the Treasury*, nonunionized firms in competition with unionized workplaces may choose to raise wages, change hiring practices, or improve their workplace environment to attract workers. This demonstrates that the positive effects of unions are not limited to union workers.

Next, let's consider the argument that unions may boost wages for some, but that this doesn't necessarily translate to overall economic growth. This argument often presents a correlation between union decline and GDP decline as causation. However, unions contribute far more than just wage increases. When workers have more security and better working conditions, it creates a more stable economic environment. Furthermore, unions can mitigate the negative impacts of globalization and technology on income inequality. According to research in *Humanities and Social Sciences Communications in 2024*, globalization negatively moderates the inequality-exacerbating effect of technological innovation in developing and developed countries.

Finally, regarding the claim that unions reduce workplace flexibility, which impedes innovation and productivity growth, we contend that the impact is not as significant as portrayed. While union contracts do establish certain rules, these rules protect workers' rights and ensure fair treatment. This leads to a more stable and experienced workforce. Moreover, union workers often have extensive experience in their fields and are encouraged to share their ideas. In fact, *the Communication Workers of America negotiated with AT&T for training programs in emerging technologies*, as reported by *Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining*. This resulted in employees acquiring skills in data analytics and cybersecurity. This example shows that unions advocate for training and skill development, leading to a more adaptable and innovative workforce.

In conclusion, unions play a crucial role in advocating for workers and promoting the conditions necessary for broad-based economic growth. Thank you.

Output B - For Side
(Optional) For Transcript B
Alright, let's get straight to it. Just to reiterate, we're defining economic growth as GDP, productivity, and income equality. The central question remains: do unions help or hinder these factors? Our opponents argue that unions inflate wages and hurt the economy. However, this argument ignores the crucial role unions play in counterbalancing corporate power and ensuring fair compensation for workers' contributions.

The opposition claims that union-driven wage increases don't translate to overall economic growth. They might even cite a study showing a GDP decline. But this is a myopic view. It's like saying exercise doesn't improve health because someone pulled a muscle at the gym. We need to consider the broader impact. The *U.S. Department of the Treasury* reported in 2023 that unions can also affect workplace norms by lobbying for workplace safety improvements or advocating for changes in minimum wage laws . Instead of simply refuting this claim, let's highlight the positive impact of higher wages. These higher wages directly fuel economic growth by increasing consumer spending.

Now, they suggest innovation and flexible labor markets are superior for growth than unions. This presents a false dilemma. A flexible labor market without worker protections can easily lead to exploitation and instability. Unions can ensure that innovation benefits everyone, not just top executives. We are not only advocating for worker protections, but also innovation. Unions actually foster a more stable and productive workforce, which is essential for sustained innovation.

To reinforce our claims, remember that unions boost wages, leading to increased consumer spending and economic growth. The *U.S. Department of the Treasury* confirms that unions help solve problems that plague the middle class, such as stagnant wages and reduced generational mobility . Union households have significantly more wealth than non-union households. This increased wealth directly fuels economic growth by increasing consumer spending, supporting local businesses and job creation. Moreover, collective bargaining reduces income inequality, leading to a stronger middle class. As *ScienceDirect* mentioned in 2016, from 1984 to 1996, the unionized labor force in Mexico fell substantially, and this decline is a source of widening wage inequality over the sample period . Union negotiations ensure workers receive a fairer share of profits. And *North America’s Building Trades Unions* reported that their union apprenticeships create skilled tradespeople, filling essential roles and supporting infrastructure development; they maintain 1,900 training centers throughout North America . This investment in skills directly contributes to a more productive and competitive economy.

Finally, their arguments about workplace flexibility and strikes fail to see the bigger picture. The "rigid rules" unions negotiate are protections against unfair treatment. And while strikes can disrupt production, they are often a last resort to correct systemic imbalances. According to *WorkRise Network* in 2023, unions give employees methods to express their opinions . Often, they are avenues for workers to express wage and benefit preferences. But they can also allow employees to notify managers about inefficiencies within company policies and the production process. These avenues for communication ultimately lead to more efficient and productive workplaces.

We've demonstrated that unions are a vital tool for building a stronger, more equitable economy. By increasing wages, reducing inequality, and fostering a skilled workforce, unions are a powerful engine for economic growth.

End of Rebuttal Stage Comparison
(Optional) Question 5: Which factors were most crucial in your assessment?
Additional Question 1 / 2
(Optional) Question 6: How long did you spend on this whole evaluation process (including reading the motion, listening to the debate, and answering the questions)?
Additional Question 2 / 2

If you find that you can't submit the results, please check back to see if you have filled in your name and if you have answered every required question with *. Thank you.

© CMU Debate Team