Welcome to the Debate Evaluation!

You'll be evaluating a debate where two sides discuss a topic. Your opinion matters - you'll vote how persuasive each side is in each stage. We will use your feedback to improve the debate quality.

What to Expect:

Debate Structure

The full debate includes:

  • Opening: 4 min audio per side
  • Rebuttal: 4 min audio per side
  • Closing: 2 min audio per side

You'll evaluate a portion of this debate.

Your Evaluation Tasks

For each stage, you'll:

  • Rate the persuasiveness of each side's statements
  • Update your position after hearing each argument
  • Provide optional feedback
Final Comparison

In the final stage:

  • You'll see two versions of each side's closing statement
  • Rate each version independently
  • Select which version you found more persuasive
Important: Before beginning, you'll vote for the side you initially support. After each stage, you'll have the opportunity to reconsider and update your position based on the arguments presented.
Note: Throughout the evaluation, you'll encounter attention check questions to ensure data quality. Participants who demonstrate thoughtful engagement will receive compensation as agreed. If you're unable to commit to providing quality responses, you may exit the survey at any time without penalty.

Rating Guide for Persuasiveness:

1
Poor

Limited evidence with poor organization or fundamental logic flaws. Disengage with no audience awareness.

2
Weak

Reasonable statements with at least one noticeable weakness.

3
Moderate

Reasonable statements, which provide on-topic evidence with logical flow and balanced emotional tone showing basic audience awareness

4
Strong

Reasonable statements with at least one impressive shining points.

5
Compelling

Powerful evidence with effective counterpoints and create deep connection with audience.

* indicate required question

Motion: Labor Unions Are Beneficial To Economic Growth


Question 1: Pre-Vote Stage
End of Pre-Vote Stage Comparison
Question 2: Opening Stage
For Side
(Optional) For - Transcript
Good morning, everyone. We're here today to discuss why labor unions are beneficial to economic growth. We face significant economic challenges: stagnant wages, rising income inequality, and skilled labor shortages that impede critical infrastructure projects. Labor unions offer a powerful solution. To ensure clarity, let's define our terms. Labor unions are organizations representing workers, advocating for improved wages, working conditions, and overall well-being through collective bargaining. Economic growth will be measured by indicators like GDP, productivity, and income equality across all demographics within the current global landscape. Today, we will demonstrate how labor unions positively impact each of these critical indicators, leading to overall economic growth.

Our criterion for this debate is identifying which side demonstrates the greatest potential for positive impact on overall economic growth. Policies that tangibly improve economic indicators should be considered beneficial.

First, labor unions boost wages, leading to higher consumer spending and economic growth. Increased wages empower workers to purchase more, stimulating demand and fostering economic expansion. *The Center for American Progress*, in their analysis of the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, found that union households possess significantly more wealth, approximately $338,482, compared to nonunion households with about $199,948. This directly translates into increased spending, particularly for low- and middle-income workers. When workers have more money, they spend it locally, supporting businesses and creating jobs, fueling economic growth. This increase in spending directly contributes to GDP growth as businesses expand to meet demand, a model that can be replicated and scaled across the country.

Second, collective bargaining through unions reduces income inequality, leading to a stronger middle class. Union negotiations ensure workers receive a fairer share of profits. This narrows the wealth gap, strengthening the middle class and creating a more balanced economy. *Research published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics* indicates that the rise of unions from 1936 to 1968 explains about 25% of the decline in the Gini coefficient, a key measure of income inequality. By reducing income inequality, unions foster a more stable and equitable economic environment, boosting long-term productivity and overall economic health, a model that can be replicated and scaled across the country.

Finally, union apprenticeships create skilled tradespeople, filling essential roles and supporting infrastructure development. Union-sponsored programs provide comprehensive training in carpentry, plumbing, and electrical work, meeting the demand for skilled workers. *A 2023 study by the Midwest Economic Policy Institute * found that union apprenticeship programs in Indiana’s construction industry deliver more training hours and better diversity outcomes. By providing standardized, high-quality training, union apprenticeships contribute to a more productive and efficient workforce, directly supporting GDP growth through infrastructure development and innovation, a model that can be replicated and scaled across the country.

Against Side
(Optional) Against - Transcript
Good morning. We appreciate the opportunity to discuss whether labor unions are beneficial to economic growth. While we acknowledge the definitions and criteria offered, we believe the central question is whether unions, on balance, promote or hinder overall economic prosperity. We contend that, despite some potential benefits for workers, the negative impacts of labor unions on economic efficiency and growth outweigh the positives.

First, labor unions hinder economic growth by artificially inflating wages above market equilibrium. Unions interfere with the natural forces of supply and demand in the labor market. By artificially increasing wages above what the market would typically bear, unions create inefficiencies. This leads to reduced hiring as companies seek to control costs, potentially increasing unemployment and slowing overall economic growth. *The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, reported in 2009* that unionizing raises wages between 0 and 10 percent, but these wage increases come at a steep economic cost . These costs cut into profits and reduce the returns on investments. Businesses respond predictably by investing significantly less in capital and R&D projects. Artificially inflated wages can also lead to higher prices for consumers, reducing their purchasing power and further dampening economic activity.

Second, union-negotiated contracts reduce workplace flexibility, impeding innovation and productivity growth. Union contracts often impose rigid rules and regulations regarding job duties, work schedules, and staffing levels. This inflexibility can stifle innovation by making it difficult for companies to adapt to changing market conditions or implement new technologies. Reduced flexibility also hinders productivity growth, as companies may be unable to optimize their workforce or respond quickly to unexpected challenges. While unions can sometimes lead to higher wages for their members, *research by Ichniowski and Shaw in 1995* found that organized steel finishing lines are less likely to adopt the most advanced combination of work practices . *The Heritage Foundation also noted in 2009* that unionized employers must pay thousands of dollars in attorney's fees and spend months negotiating before making any changes in the workplace .

Finally, union activities, such as strikes, disrupt production and negatively impact economic stability. Strikes and other forms of labor action can cause significant disruptions to production, supply chains, and overall economic activity. *Data reported in 2024* shows how strikes impact workers and communities, and the economic impact of strikes manifests itself in various forms, ranging from decreasing productivity due to the temporary halt in operations to severe strains on supply chains .

Regarding the claims made by the opposition: we acknowledge unions may boost wages for some, but this does not necessarily translate into overall economic growth. In fact, *a study by the American Action Forum in 2016* found statistically significant evidence that an increase in union membership is associated with a decline in state real GDP growth rate . Similarly, while unions may reduce income inequality in certain sectors, their impact on the broader economy is questionable. We believe that fostering long-term economic growth and opportunity for all is best achieved through policies that promote innovation, investment, and a flexible labor market, rather than through unionization.

End of Opening Stage Comparison
Question 3: Rebuttal Stage
For Side
(Optional) For - Transcript
Alright, let's get straight to it. Just to reiterate, we're defining economic growth as GDP, productivity, and income equality. The central question remains: do unions help or hinder these factors? Our opponents argue that unions inflate wages and hurt the economy. However, this argument ignores the crucial role unions play in counterbalancing corporate power and ensuring fair compensation for workers' contributions.

The opposition claims that union-driven wage increases don't translate to overall economic growth. They might even cite a study showing a GDP decline. But this is a myopic view. It's like saying exercise doesn't improve health because someone pulled a muscle at the gym. We need to consider the broader impact. The *U.S. Department of the Treasury* reported in 2023 that unions can also affect workplace norms by lobbying for workplace safety improvements or advocating for changes in minimum wage laws . Instead of simply refuting this claim, let's highlight the positive impact of higher wages. These higher wages directly fuel economic growth by increasing consumer spending.

Now, they suggest innovation and flexible labor markets are superior for growth than unions. This presents a false dilemma. A flexible labor market without worker protections can easily lead to exploitation and instability. Unions can ensure that innovation benefits everyone, not just top executives. We are not only advocating for worker protections, but also innovation. Unions actually foster a more stable and productive workforce, which is essential for sustained innovation.

To reinforce our claims, remember that unions boost wages, leading to increased consumer spending and economic growth. The *U.S. Department of the Treasury* confirms that unions help solve problems that plague the middle class, such as stagnant wages and reduced generational mobility . Union households have significantly more wealth than non-union households. This increased wealth directly fuels economic growth by increasing consumer spending, supporting local businesses and job creation. Moreover, collective bargaining reduces income inequality, leading to a stronger middle class. As *ScienceDirect* mentioned in 2016, from 1984 to 1996, the unionized labor force in Mexico fell substantially, and this decline is a source of widening wage inequality over the sample period . Union negotiations ensure workers receive a fairer share of profits. And *North America’s Building Trades Unions* reported that their union apprenticeships create skilled tradespeople, filling essential roles and supporting infrastructure development; they maintain 1,900 training centers throughout North America . This investment in skills directly contributes to a more productive and competitive economy.

Finally, their arguments about workplace flexibility and strikes fail to see the bigger picture. The "rigid rules" unions negotiate are protections against unfair treatment. And while strikes can disrupt production, they are often a last resort to correct systemic imbalances. According to *WorkRise Network* in 2023, unions give employees methods to express their opinions . Often, they are avenues for workers to express wage and benefit preferences. But they can also allow employees to notify managers about inefficiencies within company policies and the production process. These avenues for communication ultimately lead to more efficient and productive workplaces.

We've demonstrated that unions are a vital tool for building a stronger, more equitable economy. By increasing wages, reducing inequality, and fostering a skilled workforce, unions are a powerful engine for economic growth.

Against Side
(Optional) Against - Transcript
Alright, let's get straight to it. We stand firm that labor unions ultimately hinder economic growth, despite the opposition's claims. We're not just repeating ourselves; we're reinforcing our position with evidence and showing why their arguments fall short.

First, let's reinforce our core argument: the negative impacts of labor unions on economic efficiency outweigh any potential benefits. As we've discussed, unions inflate wages, reduce workplace flexibility, and disrupt production through strikes. These aren't just abstract ideas; they have real-world consequences. It's about the big picture: unions ultimately make the economy less efficient, and evidence from *the National Bureau of Economic Research*, a non-partisan organization that provides economic research to policymakers, shows that unionization can decrease the market value of affected businesses by at least $40,500 per worker. For example, in 2024, the manufacturing industry experienced a total revenue loss of $2.8 billion from striking activity, according to *Noggin*.

Second, we need to address their claim that unions boost wages, leading to economic growth. While some workers might see higher wages, this doesn't guarantee overall growth; in fact, it can be detrimental. It's like trying to build a house with only expensive materials and no skilled labor. The high costs will make it difficult to complete the project, and the house may not be structurally sound. *IZA World of Labor* confirms that union wage increases can negatively impact firms, especially where the premium is extracted from firms without excess profits.

Third, let's talk about income inequality. They argue that collective bargaining reduces it, but we disagree. Policies that encourage innovation, investment, and flexible labor markets are more effective at creating long-term economic growth and opportunity for everyone.

Now, let's address the idea that unions counterbalance corporate power. While this sounds good in theory, unions create economic inefficiencies in practice. We should focus on a competitive market where fair compensation comes naturally, not through artificial means.

Next, they say unions ensure innovation benefits everyone and foster a stable workforce. But union contracts often impose rigid rules that stifle innovation and make it hard for companies to adapt. According to *the National Bureau of Economic Research*, innovation production declines in each year following unionization.

Finally, let's talk about employee opinions and efficiency. They claim unions improve workplaces through communication, but strikes disrupt production and hurt economic stability. *Strikes, Labor Disputes & Capacity Constraints* indicates that even a short strike can be devastating to the global supply chain, and it often takes months for the economy to fully feel the effects of a strike or labor dispute.

By embracing innovation, fostering investment, and promoting a flexible labor market, we can create a more dynamic and prosperous economy where businesses can thrive, and workers can find meaningful employment and achieve upward mobility.

End of Rebuttal Stage Comparison
Question 4: Closing Stage
For Side
(Optional) For - Transcript
In closing, let's be clear: this debate boils down to one fundamental question: are labor unions a help or a hindrance to real economic growth, encompassing GDP, productivity, and equality? We've demonstrated definitively that they are a help.

First, unions directly boost wages, addressing a critical problem plaguing the middle class. According to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, unions empower workers by increasing their wages, which in turn fuels consumer spending. This isn't just abstract economics; it's about you having more money in your pocket, supporting local businesses and creating jobs. Our opponents have presented no credible evidence to suggest this is detrimental to economic growth.

Second, our opponents ignore the crucial role unions play in reducing inequality. Unions ensure that the benefits of innovation are shared broadly, creating a more stable workforce. Stable workforces directly contribute to long-term growth. *ScienceDirect* has demonstrated that the decline of unionized labor forces in Mexico lead to wage inequalities.

Third, let's address their key argument: that union inflexibility stifles innovation. This simply doesn't hold up. Unions provide a crucial avenue for communication between workers and management, ultimately making workplaces more efficient. The WorkRise Network supports this. And strikes are a last resort, preventing far greater imbalances within our economic system.

Therefore, we've proven that unions are essential for building a stronger, more equitable economy. By increasing wages, reducing inequality, and supporting a skilled labor force, unions drive sustained economic growth. The overall benefits far outweigh the costs, leading to positive economic outcomes for all. Please vote FOR the motion.
Output A - Against Side
(Optional) Against - Transcript A
In conclusion, the central question is whether labor unions genuinely benefit overall economic growth. Despite the opposition's claims, we've demonstrated they do not, as their focus on wage increases for a few overlooks the significant harm to the broader economy.

First, we established that unions artificially inflate wages, reduce workplace flexibility, and disrupt production. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, increased unionization demonstrably decreases the market value of businesses. The opposition hasn't addressed this inefficiency, instead focusing on narrow benefits for union members.

Second, the crucial issue is the stifling of innovation. While the opposition claims unions ensure shared benefits, we've shown how rigid union contracts hinder innovation. The National Bureau of Economic Research supports this, noting that union workplaces often struggle to adapt to new technologies and processes. Their argument assumes unions foster productivity, which is contradicted by the evidence we presented.

Finally, the opposition prioritizes a small group at the expense of the entire economy. While they champion wage increases for union members, we advocate for policies promoting innovation, competition, and opportunity for all workers and businesses.

Therefore, for a dynamic economy where businesses thrive, workers experience upward mobility, and innovation flourishes, a competitive environment free from artificial constraints is essential. Embrace innovation, flexibility, and free markets, rather than the rigid control of labor unions. Vote AGAINST policies that hinder economic growth and opportunity.
Output B - Against Side
(Optional) Against Transcript B
In conclusion, let's remember the heart of this debate: Do labor unions genuinely benefit economic growth, or do they impede it? We've shown they impede it. The core issue is economic efficiency. Unions inflate wages above market rates, harming businesses and, ultimately, everyone.

As the *National Bureau of Economic Research * has found, unionization can decrease a business's value by over $40,500 per worker. This isn't about offsetting corporate power; it's about economics. Artificially inflated wages mean less capital for investment and innovation, the true engines of growth.

Union contracts stifle innovation. These contracts impose rigid rules that reduce flexibility. Reduced flexibility hinders productivity growth, essential for long-term prosperity. Innovation cannot thrive when shackled. Companies need the freedom to adapt, something union contracts prevent.

Furthermore, we cannot ignore the economic impact of strikes. Strikes disrupt production and cripple supply chains. The manufacturing industry alone experienced billions in revenue losses in 2024 due to strike-related disruptions. These disruptions affect businesses, consumers, and the economy.

Now, consider the opposition's claims that unions increase consumer spending and reduce inequality. The burden of proof lies with them to demonstrate genuine economic benefits. Increasing wages through innovation and productivity, not artificial inflation driven by union demands, is the sustainable path.

Therefore, for a dynamic and prosperous economy, we need policies that foster innovation, encourage investment, and promote flexibility, not policies that empower unionization. I urge you to vote against this motion and support true economic growth.
End of Closing Stage Comparison
(Optional) Question 5: Which factors were most crucial in your assessment?
Additional Question 1 / 2
(Optional) Question 6: How long did you spend on this whole evaluation process (including reading the motion, listening to the debate, and answering the questions)?
Additional Question 2 / 2

If you find that you can't submit the results, please check back to see if you have filled in your name and if you have answered every required question with *. Thank you.

© CMU Debate Team