Welcome to the Debate Evaluation!

You'll be evaluating a debate where two sides discuss a topic. Your opinion matters - you'll vote how persuasive each side is in each stage. We will use your feedback to improve the debate quality.

What to Expect:

Debate Structure

The full debate includes:

  • Opening: 4 min audio per side
  • Rebuttal: 4 min audio per side
  • Closing: 2 min audio per side

You'll evaluate a portion of this debate.

Your Evaluation Tasks

For each stage, you'll:

  • Rate the persuasiveness of each side's statements
  • Update your position after hearing each argument
  • Provide optional feedback
Final Comparison

In the final stage:

  • You'll see two versions of each side's closing statement
  • Rate each version independently
  • Select which version you found more persuasive
Important: Before beginning, you'll vote for the side you initially support. After each stage, you'll have the opportunity to reconsider and update your position based on the arguments presented.
Note: Throughout the evaluation, you'll encounter attention check questions to ensure data quality. Participants who demonstrate thoughtful engagement will receive compensation as agreed. If you're unable to commit to providing quality responses, you may exit the survey at any time without penalty.
Second Questionnaire: This questionnaire takes around 10 minutes. After submitting this questionnaire, you will be automatically redirected to the next questionnaire, which will take around 15 minutes. If both questionnaires are completed, you will receive the compensation as agreed. If you are unable to commit to completing both questionnaires at this time, please feel free to exit. We understand that your time is valuable and appreciate your participation thus far.

Rating Guide for Persuasiveness:

1
Poor

Limited evidence with poor organization or fundamental logic flaws. Disengage with no audience awareness.

2
Weak

Reasonable statements with at least one noticeable weakness.

3
Moderate

Reasonable statements, which provide on-topic evidence with logical flow and balanced emotional tone showing basic audience awareness

4
Strong

Reasonable statements with at least one impressive shining points.

5
Compelling

Powerful evidence with effective counterpoints and create deep connection with audience.

* indicate required question

Motion: Ai Will Lead To The Decline Of Human Creative Arts


Question 1: Pre-Vote Stage
End of Pre-Vote Stage Comparison
Question 2: Opening Stage
Output A - For Side
(Optional) For - Transcript A
We're here today to address a crucial question: will AI lead to the decline of human creative arts? To ensure we're on the same page, let's define what we mean. We're not talking about minor ups and downs in the art market. We're arguing that AI, through its increasing ability to mimic, automate, and commodify creative work, will fundamentally reduce the perceived value, originality, and economic viability of human-created art across all mediums. This will result in a cultural shift where human artistic expression is marginalized and undervalued. Our concern is the long-term impact on how we perceive, create, and support art.

To properly evaluate this, we propose the most important criteria is whether AI negatively impacts the value, originality, and economic opportunity for human artists in the long run. By "value," we mean the perceived worth of art in society. By "economic opportunity," we mean the ability of artists to make a living. Are we fostering a world where human creativity is cherished and supported, or one where it's increasingly overshadowed by algorithms?

First, let's consider the value of human art. The ease with which AI can generate art devalues the years of dedicated skill and training required for traditional artistic mastery. As *researchers at the University of Oxford* noted in their 2023 study on the impact of AI on creative industries, the act of AI replicating a skilled artist’s work creates the perception that art is easy to create and proliferate, and therefore less valuable. Imagine someone typing a simple prompt and instantly generating an image that mimics the style of a master painter. This ease of creation cheapens the perceived value of human artistic skill, making it harder to appreciate the dedication and effort that goes into creating art by hand.

Second, let's examine originality. AI’s algorithmic approach to art flattens artistic expression, leading to a homogenization of styles and themes. Diversity and originality are vital to a thriving art scene. AI art, in this sense, is like a library where every book is written using the same set of phrases. While technically impressive, the result is a lack of unique voices and perspectives. Just as a garden needs diverse plants to flourish, the art world needs a variety of styles and approaches to truly thrive. According to *MIT Technology Review in 2019*, AI art often relies on remixing pre-existing data, prompting concerns that it may lack genuine originality. This ultimately leads to a less vibrant and engaging cultural landscape.

Third, let's address economic opportunity. The rise of AI art poses a significant threat of job displacement for human artists, further exacerbating economic inequality within the creative sector. If companies can leverage AI to create art for commercial purposes, they are less likely to hire human artists. *Statista's 2024 AI Art Statistics* reports that 55% of artists believe that AI will negatively impact their ability to generate income. This could lead to a decline in income and opportunities for artists, making it even harder for them to pursue their passion.

In conclusion, we firmly believe that AI poses a significant threat to the future of human creative arts by devaluing skills, homogenizing styles, and threatening jobs. Therefore, we must act. I urge you to support human artists by actively seeking out and valuing their work, advocating for policies that protect artists' rights, and being mindful of the art you consume. Let's ensure a future where human creativity continues to flourish.

Output B - For Side
(Optional) For Transcript B
Imagine a world devoid of the raw emotion in Frida Kahlo's self-portraits, the electric energy of Jimi Hendrix's guitar riffs, or the poignant social commentary of Spike Lee's films. Is that the kind of world we want to create? Good morning, everyone. We are here today to discuss a critical question: Will AI lead to the decline of human creative arts? We firmly believe that it will.

To ensure we're all on the same page, let's define what we mean by this motion. We argue that AI, through its increasing capacity to mimic, automate, and commodify creative processes, will diminish the perceived value, originality, and economic viability of human-generated art across various mediums. This will ultimately lead to a cultural shift where human artistic expression is marginalized and less valued. By "algorithmic art," we're referring to art generated by computer algorithms trained on existing datasets.

Now, let’s move on to our arguments. First, the ease of AI art generation devalues the years of skill and training required for traditional artistic mastery. Think about it: when AI can produce passable art instantly, it undermines the perceived worth of human artists who have dedicated their lives to honing their craft. According to *Yale experts*, AI art generators are changing the way people view art. One expert noted that "the ease of AI-generated art leads to a devaluation of the years of training artists undertake." This isn't just about hurt feelings; it can lead to decreased motivation for individuals to pursue traditional art forms, resulting in a loss of expertise.

Second, AI's algorithmic art flattens artistic expression, leading to a homogenization of styles and themes. AI is trained on existing datasets. Because AI is trained on existing datasets, it tends to replicate established patterns, leading to a homogenization of styles and themes as it remixes the same source material. As *MIT Technology Review reported in 2019*, AI art often relies on remixing pre-existing data, prompting concerns that it may lack genuine originality. This diminishes the originality and diversity that arise from human artists' unique experiences and perspectives. As one former journalist remarked, there hasn’t been a single AI-generated creative work that has really stuck with me … it all just glides right past and disappears. Imagine a world where all art looks and feels the same – a 'sameness' that reduces its cultural value and the unique voice of the artist.

Third, the rise of AI art could lead to job displacement for human artists, further exacerbating economic inequality. As AI becomes more capable of producing art, businesses may choose to replace human artists with AI-powered tools. *UN Trade and Development * reported that since 2022, generative AI systems have made significant inroads into creative industries such as art, music and creative writing, areas long considered the exclusive domain of humans. This leads to job losses and increased competition in the art market. According to *the Academy of Animated Art*, a poll among artists reveals 55% believe that AI will negatively impact their ability to generate income. This could disproportionately affect artists from marginalized communities, widening the gap between the haves and have-nots in the art world.

In conclusion, we believe AI poses a significant threat to human creative arts by devaluing skills, homogenizing styles, and displacing artists. Let's champion policies that support human artists in the age of AI, and let's prioritize and celebrate human-created art to ensure its continued vitality.

End of Opening Stage Comparison
(Optional) Question 5: Which factors were most crucial in your assessment?
Additional Question 1 / 2
(Optional) Question 6: How long did you spend on this whole evaluation process (including reading the motion, listening to the debate, and answering the questions)?
Additional Question 2 / 2

If you find that you can't submit the results, please check back to see if you have filled in your name and if you have answered every required question with *. Thank you.

© CMU Debate Team